James Dobson just has to be responsible for many psycopaths in America

James Dobson.
Image via Wikipedia

Dr. Dobsons advice books have sold millions of copies and even though his prescriptions have been refuted over and over, he contines to reap millions of dollars from sales of his books. This can only be occurring because his buyers are Idiot Americans who have been raised by other Idiot Americans to follow dogma and superstition and avoid reason at all costs.

Advice of violence-prevention professionals compared to advice of James Dobson

Compiled by Eric Perlin
A critical look at the evangelical right’s leading proponent of violent authoritarianism in the family, Dr. James Dobson, through quotes from his best-selling publications. In the following material, Dobson’s admonitions (shown here in green when viewed with Netscape) are juxtaposed for easy comparison to the advice of experts in the fields of domestic violence and child-sexual-abuse prevention. (shown in italics for this post)

Psychologists Ronald Slaby and Wendy Roedell: “(O)ne of the most reliable predictors of children’s level of aggression is the heavy use by parents of harsh, punitive discipline and physical punishment… Parental punitiveness has been found to be positively correlated with children’s aggression in over 25 studies…(P)arental punishment is one important aspect of a general pattern of intercorrelated parental behaviors that influence the child’s aggression.” 1

James Dobson: “Contrary to what it might seem, (a child) is more likely to be a violent person if his parent fails to (spank him), because he learns too late about the painful consequences of acting selfishly, rebelliously, and aggressively.”2

Protect Your Child by Laura Hutton: “Every child should be taught that he has personal rights that should be respected by all adults…’I have the right to say no if someone touches or wants to touch the private parts of my body.’ ” 3

James Dobson: “A spanking is to be reserved for use in response to willful defiance, whenever it occurs. Period!” 4

Victims Information Bureau of Suffolk County: “The pain a woman feels cannot be measured by how many bruises she has on her body… Most women report that even if the physical abuse is not severe, the emotional trauma from being abused by someone they love has long-lasting effects.” 5

James Dobson: “When a youngster tries this kind of stiff-necked rebellion, you had better take it out of him, and pain is a marvelous purifier.” 6 “…It is not necessary to beat the child into submission; a little bit of pain goes a long way for a young child. However, the spanking should be of sufficient magnitude to cause the child to cry genuinely.” 7

Victims Information Bureau of Suffolk County: “Many men make statements such as, ‘My partner makes me hit her.’ Blaming the victim is an easy way of denying responsibility for your own behavior…. No matter what your partner does, you don’t have the right to hurt her.” 8

James Dobson: “Some strong-willed children absolutely demand to be spanked, and their wishes should be granted.”9

Protect Your Child: ” I have a right to scream for help even if I am told by a molester to be quiet and obey….l don’t have to obey someone who hurts me or wants to hurt me.” 10

James Dobson: “Two or three stinging strokes on the legs or buttocks with a switch are usually sufficient to emphasize the point, ‘You must obey me.’ ” 11

Suffolk County Women’s Services: “You cannot end the violence by trying to be ‘better’ or by trying harder to please your abuser.” 12

James Dobson: “You can explain (to your child) why he has been punished and how he can avoid the difficulty next time.” 13

The Safe Child Book by Sherryl Kerns Kraizer: “We need to look at the ways in which we teach our children to be blindly obedient to adults and authority figures. Most children do not know they can say no to a police officer, a teacher, a principal, a counselor, a minister, a baby-sitter, or a parent when an inappropriate request is made.” 14

James Dobson: “By learning to yield to the loving authority…of his parents, a child learns to submit to other forms of authority which will confront him later in his life — his teachers, school principal, police, neighbors and employers.” 15

Suffolk County Women’s Services: “You have a right to a life free from abuse.” 16

James Dobson: “Most (children) need to be spanked now and then.” 17

The Safe Child Book: “Young children tell me that some of the ways they don’t like to be touched are: kisses on the mouth, getting their shirts tucked in by grown-ups, being picked up, having their hair stroked, having to kiss Grandma and Grandpa or Mom and Dad’s friends… They can be unwanted touch, just as sexual abuse is unwanted touch… It is important to respect children’s preferences. By learning to say no to one type of touching, children learn to say no to the other.” 18

James Dobson: “Minor pain can…provide excellent motivation for the child… There is a muscle, lying snugly against the base of the neck… When firmly squeezed, it sends little messengers to the brain saying, ‘This hurts; avoid recurrence at all costs’.” 19

Victims Information Bureau of Suffolk County: “Men who abuse do so in order to maintain power and control over their partners.” 20

James Dobson: “A child wants to be controlled.” 21 “… The need to be controlled and governed is almost universal in childhood… It is through loving control that parents express personal worth to a child.” 22

The Safe Child Book: “Private parts include the genital area, the buttocks, and the breasts. It is sometimes easier for parents to say something like ‘The parts of your body that your bathing suit and underwear cover up are special parts of your body. You can touch yourself there, but other people shouldn’t. except if you’re sick or at the doctor. Those same parts of the body are special for other people and it’s not okay for someone older than you to touch you…’ ” 23

James Dobson: “If a parent responds appropriately, on the backside, he has taught the child a valuable lesson…” 24

Victims Information Bureau of Suffolk County: If your partner has to change her behavior in order to keep herself free from your physical or verbal assaults… then she is being abused.” 25

James Dobson: “Corporal punishment in the hands of a loving parent is a teaching tool by which harmful behavior is inhibited.” 26

Child Sexual Abuse Prevention: Tips to Parents: “Children who may be too frightened to talk about sexual molestation may exhibit a variety of physical and behavioral signals. …Symptoms (include):..excessive crying…” 27

James Dobson: “Real crying usually lasts two minutes or less, but may continue for five. After that point, the child is merely complaining… I would require him to stop the protest crying, usually by offering him a little more of whatever caused the original tears.” 28

Victims Information Bureau of Suffolk County: “Batterers over-personalize their partner’s behavior, perceiving any disagreements as attacks against him.” 29

James Dobson: “When a child has lowered his head and clenched his fist, he is daring the parent to take him on.” 30

Child Sexual Abuse Prevention: Tips to Parents: “Other behavioral signals (that indicate a child may have been sexually molested include)…aggressive or disruptive behavior…” 31

James Dobson: “An appropriate spanking from a loving parent in a moment of defiance provides (a) service. It tells (the child)…he must steer clear of certain social traps… selfishness, dishonesty, unprovoked aggression, etc.” 32

Victims Information Bureau of Suffolk County: “When trying to resolve a conflict, look for ‘WIN-WIN’ solutions, where both of you feel that the resolution is acceptable. Don’t make your partner into your opponent. Remember that the goal is to solve a problem, not have the ‘upper hand’.” 33

James Dobson: “When you are defiantly challenged, win decisively.” 34

Notes

1. Slaby and Roedell, “The Development and Regulation of Aggression in Young Children,” in Judith Worell, ed., Psychological Development in the Elementary Years (New York: Academic Press, 1982), pp. 98, 106, 107.
2. Dobson, James, Dare to Discipline, Tyndale House and Bantam Books, p. 41.
3. Huchton, Laura M., Protect Your Child, Prentice-Hall, Inc., p. 71.
4. Dobson, James, The Strong-Willed Child, Tyndale House and Bantam Books, p. 37.
5. Domestic Partner Education Program, Victims’ Information Education Bureau of Suffolk, p. 10.
6. Dare to Discipline, p. 16.
7. Dare to Discipline, p. 23.
8. Domestic Partner Education Program, , p. 7.
9. The Strong-Willed Child, , p. 73.
10. Protect Your Child, p. 71.
11. The Strong-Willed Child, pp. 53-4.
12. Confronting Family Violence, Suffolk County Women’s Services, p. 3.
13. Dare to Discipline, p. 23.
14. Krazier, Sherryl Kerns, The Safe Child Book, Dell Publishing Company, lnc., p. 98.
15. The Strong-Willed Child, p. 235.
16. Confronting Family Violence p. 3.
17. The Strong-Willed Child, p. 63.
18. The Safe Child Book, p. 47.
19. Dare to Discipline, p. 26.
20. Domestic Partner Education Program, p. 4.
21. Dare to Discipline, p. 16.
22. Dare to Discipline, p. 39.
23. The Safe Child Book, p. 48.
24. Dare to Discipline, p. 40.
25. Domestic Partner Education Program, p. 5
26. The Strong-Willed Child, p.35.
27. Child Sexual Abuse Prevention: Tips to Parents, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Human Development Services, Administration for Children, Youth and Families, National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect.
28. Dare to Discipline, p.38.
29. Domestic Partner Education Program, p. 9.
30. Dare to Discipline, p. 40.
31. Child Sexual Abuse Prevention: Tips to Parents
32. The Strong-Willed Child, p. 36.
33. Domestic Partner Education Program, p. 17.
34. Dare to Discipline, p. 36.
See Eric Perlin vs. Stephen B.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]


Religious Indoctrination and the Atheist’s Moral Imperative

There are many truths about human nature that have ugly consequences for religion. We can certainly understand why religion so doggedly clings to us as a species by understanding human nature. However, this understanding should motivate us all the more to do anything and everything we can to end the power of religion.

Human nature and religion form a self-reinforcing circle of irrationality. Many studies indicate that the tendency towards religiosity is an evolutionary trait. There are several very well established reasons for this. First, we are biased towards finding patterns, even when there are no ‘real’ patterns to be found. False positives are much less detrimental to our health than false negatives. Consider an ancient human who thinks he sees a tiger in the grass. If he is an ordinary human, he will probably run as fast as he can away from where he thinks the tiger is hiding. If there is a tiger, perhaps he will have a chance to make it to safety before he is caught. If there is no tiger, then the whole exercise has been for naught, but he is essentially none the worse for his fright and flight. On the other hand, if there is a tiger, and the human doesn’t recognize the pattern of stripes in the grass, he will almost certainly die. So, there is a perfectly reasonable explanation for why humans are so prone to seeing patterns, even when they aren’t real.

Another part of human nature is the tendency to assume agency. That is, we are built to assume motive behind events. Again, the logic is perfectly clear. If a volley of small rocks comes hurtling above the treetops and lands near your encampment, it is to your advantage to believe there was an agent behind the event. If there are rival humans hiding in the trees tossing rocks, it would do very well for you to grab your spear and get ready for combat. If, on the other hand, it is a freak occurrence, say, from a boulder falling off of a cliff and breaking into stone shrapnel, nothing has been lost by being prepared, just in case.

These two human tendencies go a long way to explaining how religion might have formed. Our tendency to assume agency could easily lead us to believe that a drought was intentionally created to punish us for some transgression. If a meteor happened to cross the sky when the shaman told his story of what god was responsible for the drought, the human tendency to find patterns could easily kick in, and the rest, as they say, is history. For millennia, humans have been seeing coincidences, mistaking correlation for causation, and ascribing agency to made up entities.

The full realization of the scientific method has gone a long way towards correcting many of our errant interpretations of the universe, but religion has been the most resistant to science precisely because it taps into our deepest feelings of self. Religion tries (and fails miserably) to answer questions of happiness, meaning, sexuality, and morality. These are quite literally the things that make us human. Recent advances in the study of human nature have given us knowledge to back up the claim that religion’s failures simply cannot be idly condoned.

In our studies, we have discovered that far from being unique in the world, humans really are like the other animals in virtually every way. If giving a rat a certain chemical causes certain changes in its behavior, giving a human a comparable chemical will cause comparable changes in the human. This much has been common knowledge for a long time, but what we’ve recently discovered is that we are not really the masters of our environment any more than other animals.  In other words, our consciousness is just as inexorably altered by our environment as any other creature’s.  It’s not some removed “soul.”  It’s a dynamic part of the natural environment.   If you repeatedly beat a dog with a stick, but only while wearing a William Shatner mask, the dog will bear a lifelong hatred of William Shatner masks.  If you repeatedly reward a puppy for sitting on command, it will sit on command for the rest of its life.  If you take a child to church every Sunday for twenty years, and teach him that God is watching him and hates it when he masturbates, he will have guilty feelings about masturbation for his whole life.

4 Generations at Church

4 Generations at Church

That last sentence probably wrinkled a few eyebrows. Clearly, some theists become atheists, so people aren’t just like dogs, right? Yes and no, as it turns out. Because humans have more brain power than dogs, and because we are much better at abstract thought, it is possible for humans to reach conclusions which convince them that their “training” was misguided and that they should no longer act the way they were trained. However, we’ve also learned that some things defy logic no matter how much we want them to conform. I’ve used the example before of women who experience sexual trauma as young girls. Ask any psychologist and you’ll learn that a group of a hundred sexually abused girls is just a few decades away from being a group of a hundred aging women who aren’t over being sexually abused girls. Some things really do scar us for life, and even though we may rationally realize that our scars are only doing us harm, the scars remain.

In our hypothetical group of a hundred sexually abused women, we would be absolutely shocked if nearly all of them didn’t want to have a normal sex life, or to be able to think of men as something other than dangerous, or to simply have an orgasm for the first time. If they have had psychological therapy, they are almost certainly aware thatlogically, there’s no reason for them to continue to have deep seated emotional problems since they are no longer in a position of vulnerability. Still, they will continue to have problems. Some things that are done cannot be undone.

Religious indoctrination is a lot like sexual abuse. In fact, I believe a case could be made that it is a form of sexual abuse in some cases. Many religious denominations teach young girls that their bodies are evil, and that they are literally responsible for all the evil in the world because of Eve’s temptation of Adam. (Even if children are not aware of the sexual imagery inherent in this story, it cannot help but have an effect.) Many girls are taught that masturbation is a sin. Young women are told that they are evil sluts if they have sex before marriage, but after marriage, they are expected to turn into willing and sexually healthy partners for their one and only life partner. If they happen to get divorced, many women believe that every sexual act they participate in for the rest of their lives will be a sin.

It’s not just young girls that suffer. How horrible must it be to have a healthy sexual appetite – for your own sex – and be taught that your thoughts and desires are abominations that make you one of the worst kinds of sexual deviants in the world? Can we reasonably expect homosexuals who were raised in fundamentalist religious households to ever have any hope of getting all of the cobwebs out of the attic? Will they ever be able to see themselves as normal and natural? The evidence I’ve seen is not encouraging.

Are these teachings the equivalent of physical sexual abuse? I don’t know. I do know that teaching girls that sex is evil can and does cause lifelong problems for women, even after they abandon religion. I do know that many gays who were raised Christian still feel that they are doing something wrong.  Many women raised in these strict cultures experience sexual dysfunction as adults — often the same kinds of sexual dysfunction we see in cases of physical sexual abuse.  If the effects are the same, does that make the causes equivalent? I suggest that it probably does. We can certainly cut religious parents some slack when it comes to motive. They certainly don’t feel like they’re sexually abusing their children, but does this make the abuse any less real?

The point of this article is not to rail against religious sexual abuse of girls or gays.  Nor is it to say that sexual dysfunction is the only negative consequence of religious indoctrination.  (I could have talked about the emotional consequences of believing that humans are inherently evil, for instance.)  It is to illustrate that our scientific understanding of human nature, particularly our inability to emotionally overcome certain forms of abuse, ought to instill in us an overwhelming sense of moral initiative. Science has given us everything we need to know. The tendency towards religion is inherent, stubborn, and evolutionary.  It will not go away.  Religious indoctrination is real and has lifelong consequences.   Conditioning works on humans just like it works on dogs and rats. If it is wrong to beat a dog with a stick while wearing a William Shatner mask, it is also wrong to teach a girl that God hates her when she enjoys sex. There simply is no conscionable excuse for anything other than outrage when we look at the billions of children who are being taught things that are not only unscientific, but demonstrably harmful.

It’s a tough hill to climb. So long as religion claims the rights to make pronouncements about morality, sex, and happiness, it will strike resonant chords in many people. Science has taught us this much. So long as our children are indoctrinated, they will bear scars for life, regardless of whether they escape religion. So long as we allow ignorance to flourish, people will have no real alternative to religion.

In my book, this sounds like the basis for a moral imperative.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]