<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The best interests of the child &#8212; UNCRC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.endhereditaryreligion.com/2010/01/the-best-interests-of-the-child-uncrc-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.endhereditaryreligion.com/2010/01/the-best-interests-of-the-child-uncrc-2/</link>
	<description>Information clearinghouse for research and information about child religious freedom rights.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:59:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa H</title>
		<link>http://www.endhereditaryreligion.com/2010/01/the-best-interests-of-the-child-uncrc-2/comment-page-1/#comment-11320</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 00:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.endhereditaryreligion.com/?p=958#comment-11320</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s conscientious parents--not tyrannical ones--who have the biggest problems with the UNCRC. It takes away the rights of the ones who best know and love the child as an individual and who have his/her best long-term interests at heart, and puts the power for decision making in the hands of a) a committee that cares only about pushing its progressive agenda, and b) a child who certainly has a definite opinion that should be heard, but who has little idea of long-term consequences of those choices. I&#039;ve seen the UNCRC used to &quot;appeal&quot; parental decisions on normal chores (not the child slavery type), to force parents to accept a minor&#039;s live-in lover living under their roof, trampling on their values and rights in the process, and to remove a young child from parents who refused to feed their son junk food. While the UNCRC has a valid place in certain areas of the world, it&#039;s fodder for abusive and intrusive policies in places that already have adequate child protection laws in place...and who value their right to self-determination as a nation. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s conscientious parents&#8211;not tyrannical ones&#8211;who have the biggest problems with the UNCRC. It takes away the rights of the ones who best know and love the child as an individual and who have his/her best long-term interests at heart, and puts the power for decision making in the hands of a) a committee that cares only about pushing its progressive agenda, and b) a child who certainly has a definite opinion that should be heard, but who has little idea of long-term consequences of those choices. I&#039;ve seen the UNCRC used to &quot;appeal&quot; parental decisions on normal chores (not the child slavery type), to force parents to accept a minor&#039;s live-in lover living under their roof, trampling on their values and rights in the process, and to remove a young child from parents who refused to feed their son junk food. While the UNCRC has a valid place in certain areas of the world, it&#039;s fodder for abusive and intrusive policies in places that already have adequate child protection laws in place&#8230;and who value their right to self-determination as a nation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention &#124; End Hereditary Religion -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.endhereditaryreligion.com/2010/01/the-best-interests-of-the-child-uncrc-2/comment-page-1/#comment-8380</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention &#124; End Hereditary Religion -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 02:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.endhereditaryreligion.com/?p=958#comment-8380</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Richard Collins, scott werle. scott werle said: RT @Librehombre: The best interests of the child — UNCRC &#124; End Hereditary Religion: http://bit.ly/7Y2fO6 via @addthis [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Richard Collins, scott werle. scott werle said: RT @Librehombre: The best interests of the child — UNCRC | End Hereditary Religion: <a href="http://bit.ly/7Y2fO6" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/7Y2fO6</a> via @addthis [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

